pzea 4IP那个XEN的跑分。。。
本帖最后由 ivmm 于 2013-7-10 20:57 编辑BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: host1.mf8.biz: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.2.0-4-686-pae -- #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
19:55:41 up1:54,1 user,load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 10 2013 19:55:41 - 20:23:45
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23580067.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3686.4 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1569.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 610624.6 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 135017.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1615934.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 976101.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 45341.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3348.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4906.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1257.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 790560.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23580067.8 2020.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3686.4 670.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 1569.6 365.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 610624.6 1542.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 135017.0 815.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1615934.1 2786.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 976101.3 784.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 45341.1 113.4
Process Creation 126.0 3348.5 265.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4906.2 1157.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1257.0 2095.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 790560.5 527.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 782.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 10 2013 20:23:45 - 20:52:03
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 63553345.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11332.5 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4617.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 787010.6 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 198811.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2348335.8 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3058882.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 310622.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10193.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10808.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1236.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2582112.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 63553345.5 5445.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11332.5 2060.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 4617.5 1073.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 787010.6 1987.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 198811.7 1201.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2348335.8 4048.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3058882.7 2458.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 310622.2 776.6
Process Creation 126.0 10193.7 809.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10808.4 2549.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1236.7 2061.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2582112.5 1721.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1851.9
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.88105 s, 45.6 MB/s
不知道有性价比不？ 一直在用
就是enzu的线路不如其他配置的洛杉矶 enzu实在不敢..
014.gif
chingwp 发表于 2013-7-10 20:57
back.gif
enzu实在不敢..
恩祖的CPU和这个真的是天上地下了
chingwp 发表于 2013-7-10 20:57
back.gif
enzu实在不敢..
突然发现了还真的enzu的线路啊 你确定是买的4核CPU1g内存4ip吗，怎么提交订单显示的面板里是1CPU？来自: Android客户端 这个真的是kvmla旗下的？
babytomas 发表于 2013-7-11 01:10
back.gif
这个真的是kvmla旗下的？
是的。。。Pzea是对国外用户推出的
babytomas 发表于 2013-7-11 01:10
back.gif
这个真的是kvmla旗下的？
-.- 便宜吧，有性价比吧
014.gif
2刀的跑分2700.。。
peaz性能不咋样，稳定性还可以
页:
[1]
2