求问老司机关于hostodo100G大硬盘VPS
本帖最后由 tmxq56 于 2016-3-27 18:24 编辑手上收个hostodo的大硬盘鸡鸡，vz 512 100G硬盘 洛杉矶，刚去看了下官方好像没得卖了，4月7号到期，问下要出的话多少钱合适。
诚心问不要水
mad.gif
补充：
年费12刀，续费同价也是12刀，有人让DD测试，不会测就找了个一键测试脚本，下面是数据
[*] BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
[*]
[*] System: 1688vip: GNU/Linux
[*] OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.8 -- #1 SMP Wed Jul 22 17:23:23 MSK 2015
[*] Machine: i686 (i386)
[*] Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
[*] CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.5 bogomips)
[*] Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
[*] CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.5 bogomips)
[*] Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
[*] CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.5 bogomips)
[*] Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
[*] CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.5 bogomips)
[*] Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
[*] 17:12:52 up 81 days,1:16,1 user,load average: 0.39, 0.09, 0.03; runlevel 3
[*]
[*]------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*]Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 27 2016 17:12:52 - 17:41:13
[*]4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
[*]
[*]Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28490434.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Double-Precision Whetstone 3440.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Execl Throughput 5964.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 890327.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 248158.3 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2234176.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Pipe Throughput 1766100.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Pipe-based Context Switching 240550.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Process Creation 17371.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7438.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2016.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]System Call Overhead 2410202.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]
[*]System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
[*]Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28490434.1 2441.3
[*]Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3440.6 625.6
[*]Execl Throughput 43.0 5964.9 1387.2
[*]File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 890327.0 2248.3
[*]File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 248158.3 1499.4
[*]File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2234176.1 3852.0
[*]Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1766100.4 1419.7
[*]Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 240550.3 601.4
[*]Process Creation 126.0 17371.8 1378.7
[*]Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7438.2 1754.3
[*]Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2016.2 3360.3
[*]System Call Overhead 15000.0 2410202.7 1606.8
[*] ========
[*]System Benchmarks Index Score 1611.5
[*]
[*]------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*]Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 27 2016 17:41:13 - 18:09:37
[*]4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
[*]
[*]Dhrystone 2 using register variables 88658235.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Double-Precision Whetstone 13873.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
[*]Execl Throughput 24570.9 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 936453.4 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 252703.8 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2536782.3 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Pipe Throughput 5069941.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Pipe-based Context Switching 1050372.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]Process Creation 44082.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17976.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
[*]Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2314.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
[*]System Call Overhead 6081586.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
[*]
[*]System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
[*]Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 88658235.1 7597.1
[*]Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13873.2 2522.4
[*]Execl Throughput 43.0 24570.9 5714.2
[*]File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 936453.4 2364.8
[*]File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 252703.8 1526.9
[*]File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2536782.3 4373.8
[*]Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5069941.7 4075.5
[*]Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1050372.4 2625.9
[*]Process Creation 126.0 44082.5 3498.6
[*]Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17976.6 4239.8
[*]Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2314.9 3858.2
[*]System Call Overhead 15000.0 6081586.3 4054.4
[*] ========
[*]复制代码 然而并没有什么卵用, vz可以把100G的硬盘卖出+∞个100G的份. 看看买来到现在硬盘大小有没有变化过，gvh以前硬盘大小经常变化 不知道这么大的硬盘拿来做什么好
楼下节操掉满地 发表于 2016-3-26 16:47
然而并没有什么卵用, vz可以把100G的硬盘卖出+∞个100G的份.
lol.gif
这个还真没注意过，只放了个小博客一直挂着
小七 发表于 2016-3-26 17:19
不知道这么大的硬盘拿来做什么好
lol.gif
拿来放图片做外链 我的150G 先试试DD个100G看看 我记得我是70出的。
lol.gif
10块收20块收了。
页:
[1]
2