PacificRack服务器访问荷兰的速度如何？

gdkelebbs · 发表于 2009-9-1 05:55:16

让 Turing 帮你ping 一下

tom · 发表于 2009-9-1 06:06:08

PING 77.72.169.14 (77.72.169.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=184 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=238 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=5 ttl=238 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=6 ttl=238 time=189 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=7 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=8 ttl=238 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=9 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=10 ttl=238 time=187 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=11 ttl=238 time=267 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=12 ttl=238 time=155 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=13 ttl=238 time=196 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=14 ttl=238 time=191 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=15 ttl=238 time=199 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=16 ttl=238 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=17 ttl=238 time=200 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=18 ttl=238 time=193 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=19 ttl=238 time=199 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=20 ttl=238 time=161 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=21 ttl=238 time=197 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=22 ttl=238 time=196 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=23 ttl=238 time=195 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=24 ttl=238 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=25 ttl=238 time=200 ms

--- 77.72.169.14 ping statistics ---
25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 23985ms

Turing · 发表于 2009-9-1 07:05:38

24小时

gdkelebbs · 发表于 2009-9-1 10:24:27

Turing · 发表于 2009-9-1 10:42:22

不知道99美圆的E5200 和149美圆的Q9300性能上差距有多大？

gdkelebbs · 发表于 2009-9-1 11:11:17

PE5200比E6550还差些，虽都属双核。
Q9300相对比较强，四核心架构。

我找下benchmark，仅供参考。

cpuer · 发表于 2009-9-1 11:51:23

恩，但价格毕竟相差50美金呢。。。Benchmark值：

一台PE 5200机器：
Pentium E5200 (dual core)
8GB RAM
300GB HDD[ol]

TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 11636191.3 308.8

Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1976.1 237.8

Execl Throughput 188.3 8398.3 446.0

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 176568.0 660.8

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 63288.0 587.6

File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1063372.0 691.3

Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 589742.3 381.7

Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1717751.5 153.6

Process Creation 569.3 26537.1 466.1

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1550.2 346.0

System Call Overhead 114433.5 1672582.9 146.2

=========

FINAL SCORE 357.4 [/ol]复制代码

Turing · 发表于 2009-9-1 12:42:07

Benchmark值：

C2Quad Q9300
8gb Ram[ol]

TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 54113246.9 1436.2

Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 2837.5 341.5

Execl Throughput 188.3 14722.0 781.8

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 212369.0 794.8

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 73443.0 681.9

File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1700540.0 1105.5

Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 1200424.9 777.0

Pipe Throughput 111814.6 3787604.8 338.7

Process Creation 569.3 42609.1 748.4

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 3043.5 679.4

System Call Overhead 114433.5 3056059.6 267.1

=========

FINAL SCORE 646.2 [/ol]复制代码差值还是挺大的，来源：http://www.hostloc.com/thread-2120-2-1.html

cpuer · 发表于 2009-9-1 13:01:10

将近一倍啊。。。但用起来不会差那么多吧

Turingcpuer · 发表于 2009-9-1 13:01:58

用不到那么多性能就没啥差距。

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			立即注册

PacificRack服务器 访问荷兰的速度如何？

PacificRack服务器访问荷兰的速度如何？