|
发表于 2011-3-18 23:09:00
|
显示全部楼层
补一个虚拟机跑分。
顺便问一下KVM+libvirt+qemu怎么显示真实的CPU信息?[ol]======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: debian: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:01:41 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (5320.1 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (5320.1 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (5320.1 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (5320.1 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 00:14:39 up 22:08, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 20 2011 00:14:39 - 00:43:024 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 14511615.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 2736.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 2956.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 510281.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 134541.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1448306.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 897497.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 229538.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 8931.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6421.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2461.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 3020445.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14511615.7 1243.5Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2736.5 497.5Execl Throughput 43.0 2956.9 687.6File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 510281.2 1288.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 134541.7 812.9File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1448306.2 2497.1Pipe Throughput 12440.0 897497.2 721.5Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 229538.7 573.8Process Creation 126.0 8931.4 708.8Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6421.6 1514.5Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2461.5 4102.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 3020445.5 2013.6 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 1124.5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 20 2011 00:43:02 - 01:11:274 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 57889164.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 10925.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 14782.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 597095.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 157927.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1983265.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 3580944.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 904558.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 48732.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21619.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2824.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 9924745.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57889164.2 4960.5Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10925.3 1986.4Execl Throughput 43.0 14782.5 3437.8File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 597095.2 1507.8File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 157927.7 954.2File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1983265.9 3419.4Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3580944.7 2878.6Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 904558.4 2261.4Process Creation 126.0 48732.3 3867.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21619.2 5098.9Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2824.5 4707.6System Call Overhead 15000.0 9924745.4 6616.5 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 3057.1[/ol]复制代码 |
|