|
|
本帖最后由 陈浩南 于 2019-8-28 17:21 编辑
没有想象中的好。一般般。估计是 cpu 降频了吧。单根 8G 内存,没有双通道。
[ol]======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: frhb22576ds: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-9-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1+deb9u5 (2019-08-11) Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz (5808.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz (5808.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 09:56:14 up 9 min, 1 user, load average: 0.52, 0.21, 0.08; runlevel 5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 28 2019 09:56:14 - 10:24:272 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 36022092.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 4287.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 1516.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 585193.5 KBps (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 157733.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1798397.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 813340.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 70091.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 11923.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11907.7 lpm (59.9 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2167.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 477842.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 36022092.2 3086.7Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4287.9 779.6Execl Throughput 43.0 1516.6 352.7File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 585193.5 1477.8File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 157733.0 953.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1798397.6 3100.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 813340.3 653.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 70091.2 175.2Process Creation 126.0 11923.9 946.3Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11907.7 2808.4Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2167.9 3613.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 477842.8 318.6 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 1022.0------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 28 2019 10:24:27 - 10:52:412 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 72031639.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 8576.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 10665.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1070647.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 286563.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3166617.8 KBps (29.9 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 1625766.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 331237.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 24606.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17729.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2319.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 922653.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 72031639.5 6172.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8576.9 1559.4Execl Throughput 43.0 10665.4 2480.3File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1070647.9 2703.7File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 286563.0 1731.5File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3166617.8 5459.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1625766.2 1306.9Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 331237.0 828.1Process Creation 126.0 24606.8 1952.9Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17729.1 4181.4Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2319.3 3865.5System Call Overhead 15000.0 922653.2 615.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 2199.5======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======[/ol]复制代码 |
|